Showing posts with label Global warming. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Global warming. Show all posts

Thursday, November 1, 2012

Obama; The Choice For Science

Credit: NOAA,  Sandy
In the wake of Sandy, with millions still without power the biggest storm of the year uncovered a surprising endorsement for President Obama.  Mayor Bloomberg has endorsed the president, mainly for three important reasons.

One believes a woman’s right to choose should be protected for future generations; one does not. That difference, given the likelihood of Supreme Court vacancies, weighs heavily on my decision.
One recognizes marriage equality as consistent with America’s march of freedom; one does not. I want our president to be on the right side of history.
One sees climate change as an urgent problem that threatens our planet; one does not. I want our president to place scientific evidence and risk management above electoral politics.
During the GOP's hurricane shortened convention, Mitt Romney delivered this epically lame line:
 President Obama promised to slow the rise of the oceans — [pauses for audience laughter(!)] — and to heal the planet.
 Scientific evidence and risk management are anathema to the republican party.  In  the face of world wide acceptance of man made global climate change the republican party stands alone, thumbing its nose at the evidence.  Recently,  US House Science, Space and Technology committee member Paul Broun (R-GA) summarized the republican party's relationship with science stating that embroyology, evolution and the big bang theory are all: "lies straight from the pit of hell". 

Thursday, April 5, 2012

Willard Romney Divorced From America's Reality

Apparently, I'm not the only one that has noticed Willard Romney's talking points are completely divorced from reality.  How can we as a nation have significant discussions about the important issues of our time when the right refuses to ground their discussions in reality.  Republicans can find no data that supports trickle down economic theory, but its the only tax policy they support.  98 percent of all climate scientists support  man made global warming theory but almost all republicans reject it.  This fantasy life has so taken over the republicans that it affects their everyday talking points.  This ad from the Obama administration highlights some of Romney's talking points which are not grounded in reality. 



ThinkProgress; Today’s TOP 10 Romney Distortions, Half-truths, & Lies
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Rick Santorum, No Facts, Just the Bible

 Santorum Drops By Iowa State FairImage by TalkMediaNews via Flickr
From the Des Moines Register
Discussing controversial classroom subjects such as evolution and global warming, Santorum said he has suggested that “science should get out of politics” and he is opposed to teaching that provides a “politically correct perspective.”


Rick Santorum would like to get science out of politics and the classroom in order to make room for religion in politics and the classroom.   He suggests that the government stop using data and facts to guide policy decisions and instead consult him and his little black bible.  Rick Santorum thinks that global warming is junk science and that climate change is a hoax, unsurprisingly, Mr. Santorum has no data to support his claims.  Not only does he want gays to stop having sex, he wants to make contraception illegal so sex is "only for procreation", again no data to support his position other than the scrawlings of long dead bronze aged goat herders.  America are you ready to remove science from religion and politics?  A majority of US congressmen believe in "millionaire job creators", "the job fairy" and the equally imaginary benefits of "trickle down economic theory" in spite of any reliable economic data to support those beliefs.  Fortunately, a recent Gallup poll of republican voters found that Rick Santorum was the least acceptable candidate at 27%.   Rick Santorum's campaign is not concerned about the polling, similar to evolution, climate change and teenage pregnancy statistics- its just data. 




Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, November 13, 2011

Exposing the "Science" Behind Climate Change Deniers

On Ethan Siegel's Blog Starts With a Bang, he analyzes data from the BEST (Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature Project) which was supposed to settle the question is Global Climate Change occurring.  Strangely, this study was funded in part by the Koch brothers and Richard Muller who headed the project was a vigorous skeptic of climate change.  When the BEST study found that indeed, the data did show a warming trend many were surprised.  It was also amazing how closely the data from the BEST study correlated with NOAA, NASA and other studies. 
But there was one dissenter, Judith Curry the sole climatologist assigned to the study, disagreed and stated that the global warming trend had slowed and the data that Richard Muller presented in the  BEST results hid the decline.
"In Prof Curry’s view, two of the papers were not ready to be  published, in part because they did not properly address the arguments of climate sceptics.
As for the graph disseminated to the media, she said: ‘This is “hide the decline” stuff. Our data show the pause, just as the other sets of data do. Muller is hiding the decline.
‘To say this is the end of scepticism is misleading, as is the  statement that warming hasn’t paused. It is also misleading to say, as he has, that the issue of heat islands has been settled.’" [1.]
 It's a great read, and Ethan Siegel explains very clearly so it's easy to see how Prof. Curry manipulated the data to create what some are calling fraudulent claims.   You can find it here.
[1.] The Daily Mail interview with Prof. Curry
Enhanced by Zemanta